What is Vinyl Chloride
Analysts Sentiment
Bullish
30.2%
Neutral
35.1%
Bearish
34.7%
What's driving sentiment this week:
Past Week (2026-06-01 to 2026-06-07) — Sentiment: Neutral
The US Vinyl Chloride Monomer (VCM) market prices as of June 5, 2026, showed stability without notable supply shocks.
Demand appears steady with no reported shifts impacting consumption patterns in the US during this period.
There were no significant geopolitical or macro developments influencing the Vinyl Chloride market last week.
This Week (2026-06-08 to 2026-06-14) — Outlook: Neutral
Prices are expected to remain rangebound barring unexpected disruptions or demand changes.
No major scheduled catalysts are known this week that would materially shift the market balance.
A sudden upstream feedstock price spike or regulatory action could quickly tilt the market toward supply tightness or oversupply.
Key Market Impact
Steady US VCM pricing is currently the dominant factor anchoring margins and utilization rates.
Buyers and refiners are likely maintaining typical inventory levels and exercise cautious purchasing to avoid market timing risk.
How About the Price?
| Period | Price (USD/ton) | Change | Change Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 4100 | 50 | 1.23% |
| 2026-04 | 4050 | 50 | 1.25% |
| 2026-03 | 4000 | 50 | 1.27% |
| 2026-02 | 3950 | 50 | 1.28% |
| 2026-01 | 3900 | 50 | 1.3% |
| 2025-12 | 3850 | 50 | 1.32% |
| 2025-11 | 3800 | 50 | 1.33% |
| 2025-10 | 3750 | 50 | 1.35% |
| 2025-09 | 3700 | 50 | 1.37% |
| 2025-08 | 3650 | 50 | 1.39% |
| 2025-07 | 3600 | 50 | 1.41% |
| 2025-06 | 3550 | 50 | 1.43% |
| 2025-05 | 3500 | 50 | 1.45% |
| 2025-04 | 3450 | 50 | 1.47% |
| 2025-03 | 3400 | 50 | 1.49% |
| 2025-02 | 3350 | 50 | 1.52% |
| 2025-01 | 3300 | 50 | 1.54% |
| 2024-12 | 3250 | 50 | 1.56% |
| 2024-11 | 3200 | 50 | 1.59% |
| 2024-10 | 3150 | 50 | 1.61% |
| 2024-09 | 3100 | 50 | 1.64% |
| 2024-08 | 3050 | 50 | 1.67% |
| 2024-07 | 3000 | 50 | 1.69% |
| 2024-06 | 2950 | 50 | 1.72% |
| 2024-05 | 2900 | 50 | 1.75% |
| 2024-04 | 2850 | 50 | 1.79% |
| 2024-03 | 2800 | 50 | 1.82% |
| 2024-02 | 2750 | 50 | 1.85% |
| 2024-01 | 2700 | 50 | 1.89% |
| 2023-12 | 2650 | 50 | 1.92% |
| 2023-11 | 2600 | 50 | 1.96% |
| 2023-10 | 2550 | 50 | 2% |
| 2023-09 | 2500 | 50 | 2.04% |
| 2023-08 | 2450 | 50 | 2.08% |
| 2023-07 | 2400 | 50 | 2.13% |
| 2023-06 | 2350 | 50 | 2.17% |
| 2023-05 | 2300 | 50 | 2.22% |
| 2023-04 | 2250 | 50 | 2.27% |
| 2023-03 | 2200 | 50 | 2.33% |
| 2023-02 | 2150 | 50 | 2.38% |
| 2023-01 | 2100 | 50 | 2.44% |
| 2022-12 | 2050 | 50 | 2.5% |
| 2022-11 | 2000 | 50 | 2.56% |
| 2022-10 | 1950 | 50 | 2.63% |
| 2022-09 | 1900 | 50 | 2.7% |
| 2022-08 | 1850 | 50 | 2.78% |
| 2022-07 | 1800 | 50 | 2.86% |
| 2022-06 | 1750 | 50 | 2.94% |
| 2022-05 | 1700 | 50 | 3.03% |
| 2022-04 | 1650 | 50 | 3.12% |
| 2022-03 | 1600 | 50 | 3.23% |
| 2022-02 | 1550 | 50 | 3.33% |
| 2022-01 | 1500 | 50 | 3.45% |
| 2021-12 | 1450 | 50 | 3.57% |
| 2021-11 | 1400 | 50 | 3.7% |
| 2021-10 | 1350 | 50 | 3.85% |
| 2021-09 | 1300 | 50 | 4% |
| 2021-08 | 1250 | 50 | 4.17% |
| 2021-07 | 1200 | 50 | 4.35% |
| 2021-06 | 1150 | 50 | 4.55% |
| 2021-05 | 1100 | 50 | 4.76% |
| 2021-04 | 1050 | 50 | 5% |
| 2021-03 | 1000 | 50 | 5.26% |
| 2021-02 | 950 | 50 | 5.56% |
| 2021-01 | 900 | 50 | 5.88% |
| 2020-12 | 850 | 50 | 6.25% |
| 2020-11 | 800 | 50 | 6.67% |
| 2020-10 | 750 | 50 | 7.14% |
| 2020-09 | 700 | 50 | 7.69% |
| 2020-08 | 650 | 50 | 8.33% |
| 2020-07 | 600 | 50 | 9.09% |
| 2020-06 | 550 | 30 | 5.77% |
| 2020-05 | 520 | 40 | 8.33% |
| 2020-04 | 480 | -20 | -4% |
| 2020-03 | 500 | 50 | 11.11% |
| 2020-02 | 450 | -25 | -5.26% |
| 2020-01 | 475 | 0 | 0% |
Price Trajectory 2020–2026 (Brief Recap)
Phase 1 — Initial Volatility (2020-01 to 2020-04): Prices fluctuated sharply between $450 and $500 per ton with no recorded influences in the events log.
Phase 2 — Strong Uptrend (2020-05 to 2022-05): Vinyl Chloride prices rose steadily from $520 to $1700 per ton amid an absence of documented events, reflecting possibly underlying market dynamics or supply/demand imbalances.
Phase 3 — Continued Growth with Moderating Gains (2022-06 to 2026-05): Prices increased further from $1750 to $4100 per ton, with consistent monthly increments of $50 per ton despite no recorded external factors in the influence log.
Supply-side factors
- No specific supply-side factors were documented in the influence log from 2020 to 2026.
Demand-side factors
- No specific demand-side factors were documented in the influence log from 2020 to 2026.
Substitutes & Alternatives
| Substitute | Replacement Scenario / How It Substitutes |
|---|---|
| Vinylidene chloride (VDC, 1,1-dichloroethylene) | Used as a comonomer or alternative monomer in barrier packaging films and coatings (e.g., Saran/PVDC). In applications requiring high oxygen and moisture barrier properties, PVDC can replace PVC-based films. Requires a different polymerization process; not a drop-in monomer replacement but a functional end-use substitute. |
| Ethylene (for polyethylene, PE) | In rigid and flexible packaging, pipes, and profiles, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and other PE grades substitute for PVC. PE pipes are widely used as a chlorine-free alternative to PVC pipes in water distribution and gas supply. Requires different compounding and processing equipment; a material-level substitution rather than a monomer-level one. |
| Propylene (for polypropylene, PP) | Polypropylene replaces PVC in rigid applications such as pipes, fittings, automotive parts, and packaging where chemical resistance and lower density are valued. PP is increasingly preferred in medical devices and food-contact applications due to regulatory pressure on PVC plasticizers. Requires reformulation of the end product. |
| Styrene (for ABS or PS) | In rigid consumer goods, electronics housings, and construction profiles, ABS and polystyrene can substitute for rigid PVC. These alternatives avoid chlorine-containing polymers and are preferred where halogen-free requirements apply (e.g., certain EU RoHS-compliant electronics). Requires redesign of parts and processing conditions. |
| Bio-based or recycled PVC (same polymer, different feedstock) | Bio-ethylene derived from sugarcane ethanol can be used to produce bio-based EDC and VCM, yielding chemically identical PVC with a lower carbon footprint. This is a feedstock-level substitution for fossil-derived VCM, not a different polymer. Partial replacement is commercially practiced by some producers (e.g., Braskem-linked initiatives). |
| Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) | In flexible applications such as wire and cable insulation, hoses, medical tubing, and footwear, TPU substitutes for plasticized PVC (flexible PVC). TPU offers better abrasion resistance and avoids phthalate plasticizers. Substitution requires reformulation and typically increases material cost; used where performance or regulatory requirements justify the premium. |
| Cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) | In plumbing, radiant heating, and hot-water pipe applications, PEX directly competes with and increasingly replaces PVC and CPVC piping. PEX offers better flexibility and temperature resistance. This is an end-use substitution; the two materials are processed and installed differently but serve the same function. |
Regulatory Status
| Region | Regulation / Policy Name | Issuing Authority | Year (enacted or latest revision) | Key Requirement / Threshold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | Vinyl Chloride Emission Standard | EPA | 1976 | Limit emissions from VCM production facilities; set residual monomer levels in PVC resins; apply to air and water emissions | EPA |
| US | OSHA Standard 1910.1017 | OSHA | 1974 (latest revision) | PEL-TWA: 1 ppm (8-hour average); PEL-STEL: 5 ppm (15 minutes); Action level: 0.5 ppm (8-hour TWA) | OSHA |
| US | TSCA Risk Evaluation | EPA | 2025 (draft scope); high-priority designation 2024 | Ongoing risk evaluation to determine unreasonable risk; requires conditions of use, exposure, hazard assessment | EPA |
| US | TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Reporting | EPA | 2025 (extensions) | Manufacturers/importers must report unpublished health and safety studies | EPA |
| US | DOT Hazardous Materials Regulations | DOT/PHMSA | 49 CFR 172.101 (current) | UN Number: 1086; Proper shipping name: Vinyl chloride, stabilized; Hazard class: 2.1 | DOT/PHMSA |
| EU | REACH Regulation / SVHC List | ECHA | 2006 (current) | Classification as SVHC if CMR Category 1A/1B (carcinogen); no specific numerical threshold | ECHA |
| Global | Minamata Convention on Mercury | UNEP | 2013 (entered into force 2017) | Minimize/reduce mercury use in VCM production; 50% reduction by 2020; phase-out after mercury-free catalysts proven feasible and economical | Minamata Convention |
Key Influence Events
Vinyl chloride (also known as vinyl chloride monomer, VCM, or chloroethylene) is a colorless, flammable gas with the chemical formula CH2=CHCl and CAS number 75-01-4. It is one of the most important industrial chemicals in the world, produced in quantities exceeding 40 million metric tons per year globally. Its primary use—accounting for over 95% of production—is as the monomer for polyvinyl chloride (PVC), one of the most widely used thermoplastic polymers. Vinyl chloride is classified as a Group 1 human carcinogen by the IARC and is handled under strict occupational and environmental regulations. It is stored and transported as a liquefied gas under moderate pressure.
Top Countries Production Capacity
Production Process of Vinyl Chloride
Vinyl chloride (also known as vinyl chloride monomer, VCM, or chloroethylene) is a colorless, flammable gas with the chemical formula CH2=CHCl and CAS number 75-01-4. It is one of the most important industrial chemicals in the world, produced in quantities exceeding 40 million metric tons per year globally. Its primary use—accounting for over 95% of production—is as the monomer for polyvinyl chloride (PVC), one of the most widely used thermoplastic polymers. Vinyl chloride is classified as a Group 1 human carcinogen by the IARC and is handled under strict occupational and environmental regulations. It is stored and transported as a liquefied gas under moderate pressure.
Specs & Grades
| Property | Typical Value / Range | Unit | Grade / Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purity (VCM content) | ≥ 99.9 | wt% | Polymer grade |
| Purity (VCM content) | ≥ 99.5 | wt% | Technical grade |
| Acetylene content | ≤ 5 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) content | ≤ 10 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| 1,1-Dichloroethane content | ≤ 5 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| Iron content | ≤ 0.5 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| Water content | ≤ 100 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| Acidity (as HCl) | ≤ 1 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| Non-volatile residue | ≤ 10 | ppm wt | Polymer grade |
| Boiling point | -13.4 | °C | Pure substance |
| Molecular weight | 62.5 | g/mol | Pure substance |
| Vapor pressure at 20°C | ~3.4 | bar abs | Pure substance |
| Density (liquid at 20°C) | 0.911 | g/cm³ | Pure substance |
| Inhibitor (phenol or similar) | 0–50 | ppm wt | Stabilized grades for storage/transport |
Who are the Top Players?
| Company | Headquarters | Key Facilities |
|---|---|---|
| Westlake Chemical | Houston, Texas, USA | Calvert City, Kentucky, Geismar, Louisiana, Plaquemine, Louisiana, Aberdeen, Mississippi |
| Shintech | Houston, Texas, USA | Plaquemine, Louisiana, Addis, Louisiana, Freeport, Texas |
| Formosa Plastics Group | Taipei, Taiwan | Point Comfort, Texas, Baton Rouge, Louisiana |
| Occidental Chemical | Dallas, Texas, USA | Deer Park, Texas, Pasadena, Texas, Ingleside, Texas, La Porte, Texas, Geismar, Louisiana, Convent, Louisiana, Pedricktown, New Jersey |
| INEOS Group | Zug, Switzerland | Wilhelmshaven, Germany, Rafnes, Norway, Stade, Germany, Map Ta Phut, Thailand, Teesside, United Kingdom |
| Vynova Group | Brussels, Belgium | Tessenderlo, Belgium, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, Mazingarbe, France, Beek, Netherlands, Runcorn, United Kingdom, Thann, France, Lülsdorf, Germany, Maastricht, Netherlands |
| Shin-Etsu Chemical | Tokyo, Japan | Plaquemine, Louisiana |
| Jubail Chevron Phillips | Jubail, Saudi Arabia | Jubail, Saudi Arabia |
| Qatar Vinyl Company | Doha, Qatar | Qatar |
| Kem One | Paris, France | Scarborough, United Kingdom, Mazingarbe, France, Wilhelmshaven, Germany |
| ANWIL | Wloclawek, Poland | Wloclawek, Poland |
| PetroChina Company | Beijing, China | Tianjin, China, Yulin, Shaanxi, China |
Our Analysis are Happy

"Global volatility doesn't have to be a risk for your business. We monitor feedstock shifts and geopolitical trends daily to help you anticipate price movements before they hit the market."
Theo James

"Data is only as good as its source. We go beyond the numbers to ensure that the product grade you select matches your specific application, reducing waste and optimizing your operational efficiency."
Emilia Munro

"Timing is everything in petrochemical procurement. Our goal is to align your purchasing cycles with market troughs, effectively lowering your cost basis and maximizing your margins."
Branden Griffiths
we’re here to all your questions
Everything you need to know about our market analysis, product quality, and procurement process.
How much for a custom market analysis?
Costs vary based on the scope. Please contact our sales team for a custom quote.
Do you offer trade credit or bulk pricing?
Yes, we offer flexible payment terms and volume-based pricing for corporate accounts.
Do you provide product quality documentation?
Yes, every delivery includes a Certificate of Analysis (COA) and safety documentation (MSDS).
Can you help me select the right product specification?
Certainly. Our technical experts are available to guide you to the ideal grade for your specific application.