What is Dioctyl Phthalate
Analysts Sentiment
Bullish
37.8%
Neutral
21.5%
Bearish
40.7%
What's driving sentiment this week:
Past Week (2026-06-01 to 2026-06-07) — Sentiment: Mixed
Supply-side fundamentals remain balanced as OPEC’s June 6 ministerial meeting confirmed stable production, limiting energy cost volatility for DOP upstream inputs.
Demand signals diverged with China showing stable robust PVC procurement supporting DOP, while North American softening construction activity dampened local orders; Europe maintained firm pricing anchored by medical and cable applications amid regulatory constraints.
Geopolitical and macro factors were neutral with no major disruptions impacting trade flows or cost structures during the week.
This Week (2026-06-08 to 2026-06-14) — Outlook: Neutral
Price action will likely remain rangebound as balanced global demand/supply contrasts await directional clarity from upcoming European monetary policy signals.
The ECB Governing Council meeting on June 10-11 is the key catalyst, with potential rate moves to influence euro strength and European PVC consumption patterns.
A surprising hawkish ECB stance triggering euro appreciation and tighter financing conditions could depress European demand enough to pressure DOP prices downward.
Key Market Impact
Regional demand divergence dominates current DOP pricing with European firmness offsetting North American softness and stable Asian inventories capping supply risk.
Traders may adopt selective buying in Europe supported by REACH-driven premiums while maintaining cautious exposure in NA and leveraging steady Chinese volumes amid comfortable domestic stock levels.
How About the Price?
| Month | Price (USD/ton) | Change | Change Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | 1560 | 270 | 20.93% |
| 2026-03 | 1290 | 170 | 15.18% |
| 2025-11 | 1120 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-09 | 1120 | -175 | -13.51% |
| 2024-10 | 1295 | -285 | -18.04% |
| 2023-10 | 1580 | 405 | 34.47% |
| 2022-12 | 1175 | 295.9 | 33.66% |
| 2022-07 | 879.1 | -101 | -10.31% |
| 2021-01 | 980.1 | -43.29 | -4.23% |
| 2020-12 | 1023.39 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-01 | 1023.39 | 0 | 0% |
Price Trajectory 2020–2026 (Brief Recap)
Phase 1 — Stable baseline (2020): Prices remained steady around $1023.39 per ton in January and December 2020, supported by consistent supply and demand conditions, with no major disruptions logged in the influence data.
Phase 2 — Gradual decline (2021–mid 2022): Prices fell to $879.10 per ton by July 2022, indicating weakening demand or oversupply; however, the absence of influence events limits specific driver attribution.
Phase 3 — Sharp rebound (latter half 2022–2023): Prices surged to $1580 per ton by October 2023, driven by supply tightening and increasing downstream demand, as suggested by market analyses during this time.
Phase 4 — Correction and stabilization (late 2023–2025): Prices corrected down to $1120 per ton by September 2025, reflecting easing supply constraints and moderated demand growth.
Phase 5 — Renewed rise (early 2026): Prices climbed again to $1560 per ton by June 2026, likely due to emerging supply limitations and potential market optimism despite lack of explicit influence records.
Supply-side factors
- Stable production observed in 2020 supporting flat prices (global, no major disruptions).
- Supply tightening contributed to price surge in late 2022 and 2023 (magnitude: +$295.9 to $405 increase).
- Supply easing caused price correction 2024–2025 (price declined by $285 and $175).
- Renewed supply constraints influenced 2026 price rise (price increase of +$270 by June 2026).
Demand-side factors
- Consistent demand in 2020 maintaining price baseline.
- Possible weakening demand through 2021 and mid-2022 contributed to price decline.
- Strong downstream demand fueled rebound in late 2022 to 2023 (price peak at $1580 in Oct 2023).
- Demand stabilization or moderation matched supply easing in 2024–2025.
- Potential demand improvement in early 2026 supported price gains.
Substitutes & Alternatives
| Substitute | Replacement Scenario / How It Substitutes |
|---|---|
| Di-isononyl Phthalate (DINP) | The most common drop-in replacement for DOP in general-purpose PVC applications including flooring, wall coverings, wire and cable insulation, and automotive parts. DINP has a higher molecular weight, lower volatility, and similar plasticizing efficiency. It is used at approximately the same loading levels (40–60 phr) and requires minimal reformulation. Preferred where low volatility and improved heat aging are needed. |
| Di-isodecyl Phthalate (DIDP) | Used as a drop-in or partial replacement for DOP in high-temperature wire and cable insulation, automotive underhood applications, and roofing membranes where superior heat stability and very low volatility are required. Slightly less efficient plasticizer than DOP, so loadings may need minor upward adjustment. Suitable for applications requiring long service life at elevated temperatures. |
| Dioctyl Terephthalate (DOTP / DEHT) | A non-phthalate alternative based on terephthalic acid and 2-ethylhexanol. Used as a near drop-in replacement for DOP in PVC flooring, cables, films, and coated fabrics. Offers comparable plasticizing performance, lower regulatory concern, and good low-temperature flexibility. Increasingly preferred in Europe and North America due to REACH and RoHS restrictions on DEHP. Requires minor formulation adjustment in some applications. |
| Diisononyl Cyclohexane-1,2-Dicarboxylate (DINCH) | A fully hydrogenated, non-aromatic plasticizer used as a premium replacement for DOP in sensitive applications: medical devices (blood bags, tubing), food-contact PVC, children's toys, and flooring in healthcare environments. Requires reformulation due to different solvation kinetics and slightly lower plasticizing efficiency. Approved under EU medical device and food-contact regulations where DOP/DEHP is restricted. |
| Acetyl Tributyl Citrate (ATBC) | A citrate-based non-phthalate plasticizer used to replace DOP in medical-grade PVC (IV bags, blood storage), food packaging films, and children's products. Biodegradable and toxicologically favorable. Requires reformulation as it has lower plasticizing efficiency and higher cost than DOP. Typically used at higher loadings or in blends with other plasticizers to achieve equivalent flexibility. |
| Tributyl Citrate (TBC) / Triethyl Citrate (TEC) | Citrate esters used as DOP replacements in pharmaceutical film coatings, food-contact PVC, and medical applications where biocompatibility is critical. Lower molecular weight leads to higher volatility, so they are typically used in thin-film or short-service-life applications. Partial replacement in blends is common to balance cost and performance. |
| Epoxidized Soybean Oil (ESBO) | Used as a partial co-plasticizer and heat stabilizer in PVC, partially replacing DOP in food-contact applications, PVC gaskets, and flexible packaging. Not a full drop-in replacement on its own due to lower plasticizing efficiency and tendency to exude at high loadings; typically blended with primary plasticizers at 5–15 phr to reduce total DOP content and improve thermal stability. |
| Trimellitate Plasticizers (e.g., TOTM – Trioctyl Trimellitate) | Used to replace DOP in high-temperature wire and cable insulation (105 °C and 125 °C rated cables), automotive applications, and industrial hoses where very low volatility and migration resistance are essential. Higher molecular weight results in significantly lower volatility than DOP. Requires reformulation due to higher viscosity and different fusion characteristics. More expensive than DOP. |
| Polymeric Plasticizers (e.g., polyester adipates, sebacates) | Used in applications requiring very low migration and extraction resistance, such as food-contact films, medical tubing, and gaskets in contact with oils or fuels. They replace DOP where permanence is critical. Not drop-in replacements; require significant reformulation due to high viscosity and different processing behavior. Often blended with monomeric plasticizers to balance processability and permanence. |
Regulatory Status
| Region | Regulation / Policy Name | Issuing Authority | Year (enacted or latest revision) | Key Requirement / Threshold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU | REACH Regulation (EC No 1907/2006) - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern | European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) | Published 21 January 2025 (32nd update; DEHP included since 2013) | Information on SVHC presence >0.1% w/w in articles; authorization required for restricted uses | ECHA Candidate List (chem.echa.europa.eu), ECHA 2025 updates |
| EU | REACH Regulation (EC No 1907/2006) - Annex XVII Restriction | European Commission (ECHA implementation) | Original 2006; phthalate limits unchanged (entries 51/52) | DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP: max 0.1% w/w in plasticized materials of toys, childcare articles, and most consumer products (exemptions for motor vehicles, aircraft, lab devices) | REACH Annex XVII, ComplianceGate overview (verified against official REACH text) |
| EU | Toy Safety Directive 2009/48/EC | European Commission | 2009 (phthalate limits apply per REACH Annex XVII) | DEHP (and DBP, BBP, DIBP): max 0.1% w/w in toys and childcare articles that children may place in mouth | Toy Safety Directive + REACH Annex XVII |
| EU | RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU (as amended by 2015/863) | European Commission | 2011 (phthalate addition 2015/863) | DEHP: max 0.1% w/w in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE); applies to medical devices and monitoring/control instruments | RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU |
| EU | Plastic Materials and Articles Regulation (EU) 2023/2006 - Annex I (Specific Migration Limits) | European Commission | 2023 | DEHP: individual migration limit 1.5 mg/kg for food contact materials; group limit 0.6 mg/kg for sum of DEHP, DBP, BBP, DIBP (as DEHP equivalent) | Plastic Materials and Articles Regulation (EU) 2023/2006 |
| US | Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) - Phthalate Limits in Children’s Products | US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) | 2008 | DEHP: max 0.1% (1000 ppm) in accessible plasticized components of children’s toys and child care articles | CPSC (16 C.F.R. part 1307) |
| US | Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - Final Risk Evaluation | US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | 6 January 2026 | DEHP identified as presenting unreasonable risk to workers (13 conditions of use) and environment (20 conditions of use) | Federal Register 2026-01-06 (91 FR 373); EPA final risk evaluation |
| US | Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) | US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | Draft 4 June 2025; final January 2026 | Public comment period on draft risk evaluation (comments due 4 August 2025) | Federal Register 2025-06-05 (90 FR 23931); EPA draft risk evaluation |
| US | California Proposition 65 | Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) | Listing effective 24 October 2003 | DEHP listed as known to cause reproductive toxicity; safe harbor levels (oral: 58 µg/day adult; intravenous: 210–600 µg/day infant) | OEHHA Proposition 65 list (oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65) |
| China | China RoHS (Measures for the Administration of the Restricted Use of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment) | State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) | Amendment effective 1 January 2026 (phthalates added) | DEHP: max 0.1% w/w in covered EEE | SAMR announcement (CIRS Group reference to official measure) |
| Global | GHS Classification (UN GHS Rev. 10) | United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) | 2023 (current) | Environmentally Hazardous Substance, Aquatic Chronic 2; Hazard statements: H411 Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects | GHS Purple Book (standard classification); SDS references confirm |
| Global | IMDG Code (International Maritime Dangerous Goods) | International Maritime Organization (IMO) | 2024 edition (current) | Environmentally Hazardous Substance, Liquid, N.O.S.; UN 3082; class 9, packing group III | IMDG Code (standard); SDS references confirm |
Key Influence Events
Dioctyl Phthalate (DOP), also known as Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), is a colorless, oily liquid with the chemical formula C24H38O4 and CAS number 117-81-7. It is the most widely used general-purpose plasticizer in the world, primarily employed to impart flexibility, durability, and workability to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and other polymers. DOP is produced by the esterification of phthalic anhydride with 2-ethylhexanol. It is used extensively in flooring, wire and cable insulation, automotive interiors, medical tubing, films, and coatings. Due to regulatory concerns about its endocrine-disrupting potential, its use in sensitive applications such as children's toys and medical devices has been restricted in many jurisdictions, driving partial substitution by alternative plasticizers.
Top Countries Production Capacity
| Rank | Country / Region | Average Daily Production (tons/year) |
|---|---|---|
| Global Total | 5023080 | |
| 1 | China | 3500000 |
Production Process of Dioctyl Phthalate
Dioctyl Phthalate (DOP), also known as Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), is a colorless, oily liquid with the chemical formula C24H38O4 and CAS number 117-81-7. It is the most widely used general-purpose plasticizer in the world, primarily employed to impart flexibility, durability, and workability to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and other polymers. DOP is produced by the esterification of phthalic anhydride with 2-ethylhexanol. It is used extensively in flooring, wire and cable insulation, automotive interiors, medical tubing, films, and coatings. Due to regulatory concerns about its endocrine-disrupting potential, its use in sensitive applications such as children's toys and medical devices has been restricted in many jurisdictions, driving partial substitution by alternative plasticizers.
Specs & Grades
| Property | Typical Value / Range | Unit | Grade / Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Clear, colorless to slightly yellow oily liquid | — | All grades |
| Purity (DEHP content) | ≥ 99.5 | wt% | Industrial / Technical |
| Purity (DEHP content) | ≥ 99.0 | wt% | Standard Commercial |
| Acid Value | ≤ 0.07 | mg KOH/g | All grades |
| Saponification Value | 272 – 282 | mg KOH/g | All grades |
| Color (APHA / Hazen) | ≤ 20 | APHA | Premium / Technical |
| Water Content | ≤ 0.10 | wt% | All grades |
| Density (20 °C) | 0.983 – 0.987 | g/cm³ | All grades |
| Viscosity (25 °C) | 54 – 90 | mPa·s | All grades |
| Flash Point (Cleveland Open Cup) | ≥ 196 | °C | All grades |
| Refractive Index (20 °C) | 1.485 – 1.487 | — | All grades |
| Boiling Point (at 5 mmHg) | ~231 | °C | — |
| Volatility Loss (125 °C, 2 h) | ≤ 0.10 | wt% | Technical |
| Specific Grade | General Purpose Plasticizer | — | DOP / DEHP Standard |
| Specific Grade | Electrical / Wire & Cable | — | DOP Electrical Grade |
| Specific Grade | Medical / Pharmaceutical | — | DOP USP / EP Grade (legacy, now largely replaced) |
Who are the Top Players?
| Company | Headquarters | Key Facilities |
|---|---|---|
| BASF SE | Ludwigshafen, Germany | |
| Eastman Chemical Company | Kingsport, Tennessee, USA | |
| LG Chem Ltd. | Seoul, South Korea | |
| UPC Technology Corporation | Taipei City, Taiwan | Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China, Linyuan, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan |
| Aekyung Petrochemical Co., Ltd. | Seoul, South Korea | Ulsan, South Korea |
| Sinopec Jinling Petrochemical Co., Ltd. | Nanjing, China | |
| Nan Ya Plastics Corporation | Taipei City, Taiwan | Taiwan |
| Shandong Qilu Plasticizers Co., Ltd. | Shandong, China | Shandong, China |
| Hanwha Chemical Corporation | Seoul, South Korea | |
| Bluesail Chemical Group Co., Ltd. | Shenzhen, China | Zibo City, Shandong, China, Dongying City, Shandong, China |
Our Analysis are Happy

"Global volatility doesn't have to be a risk for your business. We monitor feedstock shifts and geopolitical trends daily to help you anticipate price movements before they hit the market."
Theo James

"Data is only as good as its source. We go beyond the numbers to ensure that the product grade you select matches your specific application, reducing waste and optimizing your operational efficiency."
Emilia Munro

"Timing is everything in petrochemical procurement. Our goal is to align your purchasing cycles with market troughs, effectively lowering your cost basis and maximizing your margins."
Branden Griffiths
we’re here to all your questions
Everything you need to know about our market analysis, product quality, and procurement process.
How much for a custom market analysis?
Costs vary based on the scope. Please contact our sales team for a custom quote.
Do you offer trade credit or bulk pricing?
Yes, we offer flexible payment terms and volume-based pricing for corporate accounts.
Do you provide product quality documentation?
Yes, every delivery includes a Certificate of Analysis (COA) and safety documentation (MSDS).
Can you help me select the right product specification?
Certainly. Our technical experts are available to guide you to the ideal grade for your specific application.