What is Nitrogen Fertilizer
Analysts Sentiment
Bullish
36.7%
Neutral
23.1%
Bearish
40.2%
What's driving sentiment this week:
Past Week (2026-06-01 to 2026-06-07) — Sentiment: Mixed
Supply-side tone softened as Fertilizer Focus flagged accelerating urea price declines into early June 2026, with trader position unwinding adding velocity to the sell-off.
Demand fundamentals weakened on the seasonal post-application lull, though the urea benchmark still ground 0.60% higher to 419 USD/T on 2026-06-05 as Chinese export uncertainty injected a floor bid.
Macro cost structure tilted firmer on 2026-06-05 as CVR Partners flagged rising natural gas feedstock costs at Coffeyville and East Dubuque, threatening margin compression and incentivizing US producers to defend offers.
This Week (2026-06-08 to 2026-06-14) — Outlook: Mixed
Spot urea trades a tug-of-war around the 419 USD/T pivot, with cost-push from gas feedstocks countering the seasonal demand vacuum to keep price action sideways with a modest upside skew.
The Pinellas County fertilizer ordinance hearing on 2026-06-09 is the single dated catalyst, threatening incremental bearish drag on US turf and landscape nitrogen demand if restrictions tighten (expected).
A confirmed Chinese urea export quota release would flip the call decisively bearish by re-flooding seaborne supply into an already soft post-season window.
Key Market Impact
Rising natural gas feedstock costs are now the dominant force, putting a hard floor under offers even as seasonal demand erodes spot pull-through.
Traders should fade rallies above 425 USD/T while producers hold firm on June-July tons, and buyers can defer non-urgent coverage into the seasonal trough to capture any export-driven flush.
How About the Price?
| Month | Price (USD/ton) | Change | Change Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2026-04 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2026-03 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2026-02 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2026-01 | 420 | 70 | 20% |
| 2025-12 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-11 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-10 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-09 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-08 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-07 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-06 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-05 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-04 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-03 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-02 | 350 | 0 | 0% |
| 2025-01 | 350 | -30 | -7.89% |
| 2024-12 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-11 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-10 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-09 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-08 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-07 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-06 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-05 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-04 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-03 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-02 | 380 | 0 | 0% |
| 2024-01 | 380 | -40 | -9.52% |
| 2023-12 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-11 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-10 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-09 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-08 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-07 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-06 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-05 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-04 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-03 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-02 | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2023-01 | 420 | -130 | -23.64% |
| 2022-12 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-11 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-10 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-09 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-08 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-07 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-06 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-05 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-04 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-03 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-02 | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 2022-01 | 550 | 210 | 61.76% |
| 2021-12 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-11 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-10 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-09 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-08 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-07 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-06 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-05 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-04 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-03 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-02 | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 2021-01 | 340 | 110 | 47.83% |
| 2020-12 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-11 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-10 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-09 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-08 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-07 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-06 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-05 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-04 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-03 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-02 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020-01 | 230 | 0 | 0% |
Price Trajectory 2020–2025 (Brief Recap)
Phase 1 — Stable baseline (2020): Nitrogen fertilizer prices remained steady at $230/ton throughout 2020, reflecting stable market conditions with no significant supply-demand shocks reported.
Phase 2 — Initial surge (January 2021–December 2021): Prices jumped sharply to $340/ton in January 2021 (+47.8%) due to emerging global supply constraints and early demand recovery post-2020, stabilizing at this level for the remainder of the year.
Phase 3 — High peak plateau (January 2022–December 2022): Prices soared further to $550/ton by January 2022 (+61.8%), maintaining this peak for the entire year amid continued production challenges and strong agricultural demand.
Phase 4 — Downward correction (January 2023–January 2025): Prices gradually declined from $420/ton in January 2023 to $350/ton by January 2025, reflecting easing supply bottlenecks and moderating demand pressures over two years.
Phase 5 — Early 2026 rebound (January 2026): A moderate price uptick to $420/ton occurred, suggesting potential re-emergence of supply tightness or demand re-acceleration.
Supply-side factors
- Production image interruptions and capacity constraints (noted as key drivers in 2021–2022 price surges)
- Supply bottlenecks easing slowly during 2023–2025, enabling price correction downward
- Signs of renewed tightening in late 2025/early 2026 prompting price rebound
Demand-side factors
- Strong agricultural demand recovery beginning early 2021 fueling initial price surge
- Sustained high demand throughout 2022 maintaining price peak
- Moderation of demand growth contributing to new price lows in the 2023–2025 period
- Potential renewed demand pressures causing early 2026 price uptick
Substitutes & Alternatives
| Substitute | Replacement Scenario / How It Substitutes |
|---|---|
| Organic Manure (animal / poultry) | Partial replacement of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer in all crop types, particularly in organic farming systems. Applied at 10–30 t/ha to supply slow-release nitrogen; typically replaces 30–60% of synthetic N requirement. Requires higher application volumes and careful timing to match crop uptake windows. Drop-in replacement is not feasible for high-yield intensive cropping without supplementation. |
| Compost | Used as a soil amendment and partial nitrogen source in vegetable, fruit, and specialty crop production. Replaces a portion of synthetic N (typically 20–40%) while also improving soil organic matter. Not a full drop-in replacement due to low and variable N content (0.5–3% N); must be combined with soil testing and adjusted application rates. |
| Biological Nitrogen Fixation (legume cover crops / green manure) | Replaces synthetic nitrogen fertilizer in crop rotations by incorporating nitrogen-fixing legumes (soybeans, clover, alfalfa, vetch) that fix 50–300 kg N/ha per season via Rhizobium symbiosis. Widely used in integrated crop management and organic systems. Substitution is indirect—the following cash crop benefits from residual fixed N. Requires rotation planning and is not a direct product substitute. |
| Phosphate Fertilizers (MAP, DAP) | Not a nitrogen substitute per se, but DAP (18% N, 46% P2O5) and MAP (11% N, 52% P2O5) supply a portion of crop nitrogen needs alongside phosphorus in a single application. Used as a partial nitrogen source at planting, reducing the required top-dress application of straight nitrogen fertilizers such as urea or AN. |
| Slow-Release / Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers (polymer-coated urea, NBPT-treated urea) | Direct functional substitutes for conventional urea or ammonium nitrate in high-value crops, turf, and horticulture. Polymer-coated urea releases N over 30–180 days, reducing leaching losses and application frequency. Applied at the same or slightly lower N rates as conventional fertilizers. Higher unit cost limits use to premium markets. Drop-in replacement in terms of agronomic function. |
| Digestate from Anaerobic Digestion | Liquid or solid byproduct of biogas plants, containing 2–6 kg N/m3 in ammoniacal form (readily plant-available). Used as a direct substitute for liquid nitrogen fertilizers (e.g., UAN) in arable farming, particularly in Europe. Application rates are calibrated by N content analysis. Partial replacement of 20–50% of synthetic N is common in farms co-located with biogas facilities. |
| Sewage Sludge / Biosolids | Treated municipal wastewater solids containing 2–6% N (dry weight). Applied to agricultural land as a partial nitrogen source, substituting for synthetic fertilizers at rates determined by regulatory N loading limits. Commonly used in cereal and grass production. Requires regulatory compliance (heavy metal limits) and is not suitable for all crops or regions. |
Regulatory Status
| Region | Regulation / Policy Name | Issuing Authority | Year (enacted or latest revision) | Key Requirement / Threshold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | Storage and handling of anhydrous ammonia | OSHA | 2016 | Design, construction, location, installation, and operation standards for anhydrous ammonia systems including refrigerated storage | https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.111 |
| US | Storage of ammonium nitrate | OSHA | 2014 (guidance); 1910.109(i) original | 1,000 pounds or more of fertilizer-grade ammonium nitrate in crystals, flakes, grains, or prills; applies to nitrogenous fertilizer manufacturing | https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2014-12-03 |
| EU | Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) | European Commission | 2023 (definitive regime 1 January 2026) | Imports of nitrogenous mineral or chemical fertilizers (HS 3102, except urea) and mixed fertilizers (HS 3105, except 3105.60); 50-ton annual threshold per importer; embedded carbon reporting and certificates required | https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en |
| EU | Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP) Regulation | European Commission | 2008 (amended) | Ammonium nitrate classified as Oxidising solid Category 2 (H272); Eye Irrit. 2 (H319) | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32008R1272 |
Key Influence Events
Nitrogen fertilizer is a category of agricultural inputs that supply nitrogen—an essential macronutrient—to crops and soils to promote vegetative growth, protein synthesis, and yield. The dominant commercial forms include urea (46% N), ammonium nitrate (34% N), ammonium sulfate (21% N), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, 27% N), and urea-ammonium nitrate solution (UAN, 28–32% N). Nearly all synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are derived from anhydrous ammonia produced via the Haber-Bosch process, in which atmospheric nitrogen is reacted with hydrogen (sourced primarily from natural gas steam methane reforming) at high temperature and pressure over an iron catalyst. Nitrogen fertilizers are the single largest input cost in global crop production and are critical to feeding the world's population.
Top Countries Production Capacity
| Rank | Country / Region | Average Daily Production (Mt N) |
|---|---|---|
| Global Total | 200.7 | |
| 1 | China | 58 |
| 2 | United States | 18.09 |
| 3 | India | 14.86 |
| 4 | Russia | 14.26 |
| 5 | Iran | 10 |
| 6 | Indonesia | 8 |
| 7 | Pakistan | 8 |
| 8 | Algeria | 8 |
| 9 | Egypt | 8 |
| 10 | Saudi Arabia | 7 |
| 11 | Canada | 7 |
| 12 | Malaysia | 6 |
| 13 | Uzbekistan | 6 |
| 14 | Qatar | 5.5 |
| 15 | Ukraine | 5.5 |
Production Process of Nitrogen Fertilizer
Nitrogen fertilizer is a category of agricultural inputs that supply nitrogen—an essential macronutrient—to crops and soils to promote vegetative growth, protein synthesis, and yield. The dominant commercial forms include urea (46% N), ammonium nitrate (34% N), ammonium sulfate (21% N), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, 27% N), and urea-ammonium nitrate solution (UAN, 28–32% N). Nearly all synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are derived from anhydrous ammonia produced via the Haber-Bosch process, in which atmospheric nitrogen is reacted with hydrogen (sourced primarily from natural gas steam methane reforming) at high temperature and pressure over an iron catalyst. Nitrogen fertilizers are the single largest input cost in global crop production and are critical to feeding the world's population.
Specs & Grades
| Product / Grade | Nitrogen Content (%) | Key Property / Form | Typical Specification | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urea (granular/prilled) | 46.0 | Solid, white granules or prills | Biuret ≤ 1.0%; Moisture ≤ 0.5% | % w/w |
| Ammonium Nitrate (AN) | 33–34.5 | Solid granules or prills | Oil absorption ≤ 0.2%; Moisture ≤ 0.5% | % w/w |
| Calcium Ammonium Nitrate (CAN) | 26–27 | Granular solid | CaO 8–10%; Moisture ≤ 1.0% | % w/w |
| Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (UAN) Solution | 28–32 | Liquid solution | Density 1.28–1.33 g/mL; pH 7.0–8.0 | % w/w |
| Ammonium Sulfate (AS) | 21 | Crystalline solid | Sulfur 24%; Moisture ≤ 1.0%; Free acid ≤ 0.03% | % w/w |
| Anhydrous Ammonia (direct application) | 82 | Liquefied gas | Purity ≥ 99.5%; Water ≤ 0.2% | % w/w |
| Ammonium Phosphate (MAP/DAP) | 11 (MAP) / 18 (DAP) | Granular solid | P2O5 52% (MAP) / 46% (DAP); Moisture ≤ 1.5% | % w/w |
Who are the Top Players?
| Company | Headquarters | Key Facilities |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrien Ltd. | Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada | Carseland AB, Fort Saskatchewan AB, Granum AB, Joffre AB, Redwater AB, Standard AB, Augusta GA, Borger TX, Geismar LA, Kennewick WA, Lima OH, Point Lisas Trinidad & Tobago |
| Yara International ASA | Oslo, Norway | Porsgrunn Norway, Sluiskil Netherlands, Burrup Australia, Glomfjord Norway, Cartagena Colombia, Candeias Brazil, Belle Plaine Canada, Brega Libya, Brunsbüttel Germany, Ferrara Italy, Ravenna Italy, Rostock Germany, Tertre Belgium, Uusikaupunki Finland, Siilinjärvi Finland, Ambes France, Montoir France, Hull UK |
| CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | Northbrook, Illinois, USA | Donaldsonville LA, Waggaman LA, Yazoo City MS, Port Neal IA, Verdigris OK, Medicine Hat AB, Courtright ON, Woodward OK, Point Lisas Trinidad & Tobago |
| OCI N.V. | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Geleen Netherlands, Wever Iowa, USA |
| Koch Fertilizer | Wichita, Kansas, USA | Wever IA, Enid OK, Brandon Manitoba, Fort Dodge IA, Point Lisas Trinidad & Tobago |
| Grupa Azoty S.A. | Tarnów, Poland | Puławy Poland, Kędzierzyn-Koźle Poland, Tarnów Poland |
| TogliattiAzot PJSC | Tolyatti, Russia | Tolyatti Russia |
| Ostchem | Kyiv, Ukraine | Chernihiv Ukraine, Cherkasy Ukraine, Drohobych Ukraine |
Our Analysis are Happy

"Global volatility doesn't have to be a risk for your business. We monitor feedstock shifts and geopolitical trends daily to help you anticipate price movements before they hit the market."
Theo James

"Data is only as good as its source. We go beyond the numbers to ensure that the product grade you select matches your specific application, reducing waste and optimizing your operational efficiency."
Emilia Munro

"Timing is everything in petrochemical procurement. Our goal is to align your purchasing cycles with market troughs, effectively lowering your cost basis and maximizing your margins."
Branden Griffiths
we’re here to all your questions
Everything you need to know about our market analysis, product quality, and procurement process.
How much for a custom market analysis?
Costs vary based on the scope. Please contact our sales team for a custom quote.
Do you offer trade credit or bulk pricing?
Yes, we offer flexible payment terms and volume-based pricing for corporate accounts.
Do you provide product quality documentation?
Yes, every delivery includes a Certificate of Analysis (COA) and safety documentation (MSDS).
Can you help me select the right product specification?
Certainly. Our technical experts are available to guide you to the ideal grade for your specific application.